Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Snowball Throwing dengan Media TTS pada Pembelajaran IPA Kelas IV SD Negeri 02 Koto Bangun Kecamatan Kapur IX
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36665/edj.v1i2.125Keywords:
Snowball Throwing model, TSS media, student activitiesAbstract
Based on preliminary observations in class IV of SD Negeri 02 Koto Bagun, Kapur IX District, problems of science learning were found. The teacher is less varied, creative in teaching in class, only emphasizes the delivery of material and assignments. Students are less involved in learning, less enthusiastic, less motivated in discussion activities, and the use of learning media is not optimal. Formulation of the research problem "How do you increase student activity in learning science class IV SD Negeri 02 Koto Bangun Kapur District IX?". As for the specific details "Does the Snowball Throwing model with TTS media can improve teacher skills, student activities and student learning outcomes of SD Negeri 02 Koto Bangun Kapur IX District in Natural Sciences learning?". The purpose of the study was to increase student activity in learning science class IV SD 02 02 Koto Bangun Kapur District IX. The specific purpose is to describe the improvement of teacher skills, student activities and improve science learning outcomes of Grade IV students of SD Negeri 02 Koto Bangun Kapur IX District through the Snowball Throwing model with TTS media. This type of research is classroom action research, conducted in two cycles. Each cycle consists of planning, implementing actions, observing, and reflecting. The research subjects were teachers and fourth grade students of SD Negeri 02 Koto Bangun, Kapur District IX. Data collection techniques using observation, tests, field notes, and documentation. The results showed the skills of teachers in the first cycle of meeting 1 gained 29 scores, increased to 34 scores in meeting 2. In the second cycle of meeting 1 gained 37 scores, increased to 40 scores at meeting 1. The activity of cycle I students gained 21 scores, increased to 30 score at meeting 2. In cycle II gained 32 scores, increased to 37 scores at meeting 2. The percentage of mastery learning at the pre cycle was 27.27% with an average value of 69.29. In the first cycle of 63.63% with an average value of 79.09. In the second cycle of 100% with an average value of 91.82. The conclusion of the research is the Snowball Throwing model with TTS media can improve teacher skills, student activities and science learning outcomes. While the advice given is that teachers should be able to choose and use innovative learning models that are appropriate to the conditions of students, teaching materials / materials, facilities available, and the condition of the teacher himself.
References
Anitah, Sri, dkk. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Aqib, Zainal, dkk. 2010. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Arifin, Khoirul. 2013. Metode Pembelajaran Snowball Throwing. http://karifin38.blogspot.com/2013/03/snowball-throwing.html
Arikunto, Suharsimi, dkk. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Cahyo, Agus N. 2011. Gudang permainan Kreatif Khusus Asah Otak Kiri Anak. Yogyakarta: FlashBooks.
Cain, Sandra E, dan Jack M Evans. 1993. Sciencing An Involvement Approach to Elementary Science Methods. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
Daryanto. 2011. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Penelitian Tindakan Sekolah Beserta Contoh-contohnya. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Depdiknas. 2008. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta:
Dirjen Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2010. Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Farhan. 2011. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Snowball Throwing. http://www.farhan-bjm.web.id/2011/09/model-pembelajaran-kooperatiftipe.html.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2012. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hamdani, M.A. 2011. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Hamid, Moh Sholeh. 2011 Metode Edutainment. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.
Hasibuan, J.J. dan Moedjiono. 2009. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Herhyanto, Nar, dkk. 2011. Statistika Pendidikan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Hidayati, Nia. 2009. Teka Teki Silang Cegah Otak dari Kepikunan.
Isjoni. 2012. Cooperative Learning Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Iskandar. 2012. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Referensi (GP Press Group).
Komalasari, Kokom. 2011. Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Lie, Anita. 2004. Cooperative Learning Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Poerwanti, Endang dkk. 2008. Asesmen Pembelajaran SD. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti. Depdiknas.
Pusat Kurikulum-Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Depdiknas. 2007. Naskah Akademik Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran IPA. Jakarta:Depdiknas.
Rifa’i, Achmad, dan Catharina Tri Anni. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: UPT UNNES Press.
Rusman. 2012. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Samatowa, Usman. 2011. Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Sardiman, A.M. 2012. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Silberman, Mel. 2010. Active Learning 101 Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Yogyakarta: Pustaka Insan Madani.
Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Slavin, Robert E. 2005. Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Sukestiyarno dan Wardono. 2009. Statistika. Semarang: UNNES PRESS. Sulistyorini, Sri. 2007. Model Pembelajaran IPA Sekolah Dasar danPenerapannya dalam KTSP. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Suprijono, Agus. 2009. Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Thobroni, Muhammad, dan Arif Mustofa. 2012. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media.
Trianto. 2012. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu: Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasi dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: BumiAksara.