ANALISIS KELAYAKAN FINANSIAL USAHA TANI BUAH NAGA (Hylocereus sp.) DI NAGARI KACANG KECAMATAN X KOTO SINGKARAK KABUPATEN SOLOK

Authors

  • Mahmud Mahmud
  • Mardianto Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
  • Renfiyeni Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
  • Fatimah Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36665/jibs.v9i1.530

Keywords:

Feasibility, payback period, sensitivity

Abstract

Research on the financial feasibility analysis of dragon fruit (Hylocereus sp.) farming was carried out in Nagari Kacang, X Koto Singkarak District, Solok Regency. The research aims to determine the farming profile and financial feasibility of dragon fruit farming. The method used is a case study with sampling using the purposive sampling method. The variables observed were cultivation techniques, costs and revenues. Investment criteria used: Net Present Value (NPV), Gross B/C Ratio, Net B/C Ratio, Internal Rate of Returns (IRR), Payback Periods. The sensitivity analysis used is a reduction in production prices of 17%. The conclusion that can be drawn is; Obtained a Gross B/C ratio of 2.62, a Net B/C ratio of 9.4, a NPV value of IDR 799,608,364, and a IRR of 30.88%. Based on the investment criteria, dragon fruit farming is feasible. From the payback analysis, the investment return period takes 5 years and 1 month. From the sensitivity analysis by reducing the price by 17%, an IRR value of 24.85% (IRR>O) is obtained, meaning that the production price decreases by 17%, this farming is still feasible to carry out.

References

Dewi, I.A.L dan I Nyoman Gede Ustriyana. 2018. Kelayakan Finansial Usahatani Buah Naga Di Daerah Perkotaan Sebagai Alternatif Tambahan Pendapatan Petani. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata 7 (1) : 172-181

Gittinger, J.P.1986. Analisa Ekonomi Proyek Pertanian. Jakarta: UI-Press

Clive, G. 1987. Pengantar Evaluasi proyek. Jakarta : PT1Gramedia

Jani, R. H., W. Susilowati., dan Asnawati. 2017. Analisis Usahatani Buah Naga Di Kecamatan Rimbo Tengah Kabupaten Bungo (Studi Kasus Usahatani Buah Naga Bapak Khusairi.SP). Jurnal Agri Sains, 1(2): 1-12.

Kadariyah. 1999. Pengantar Evaluasi Proyek. Jakarta: LPFE Universitas Indonesia.

Kementan. 2006. Jenis Komoditi Tanaman Binaan Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan, Direk-torat Jenderal Tanaman Pangan Dan Direktorat Jenderal Hortikultura. Keputusan Menteri Pertanian Nomor: 511/Kpts/PD.310/9/2006

Kriyantono, R. (2020). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif disertai contoh praktis Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertai Riset Media, Public Relations, Advertising, Komunikasi Organisasi, Komunikasi Pemasaran. Rawamangun: Prenadamedia Group.

Ningsih. K. H. Felani., H. Sakdiyah. 2015. Keragaman Uahatani Dan Pemasaran Buah Naga. Agriekonomika, 4(2): 1-17.

Siregar, S. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.

Sofyan, I. 2004. Studi Kelayakan Bisnis. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta

Sugiyono.2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung : alfabeta

Yunanda, Yudi S.P, Endang B. 2017. Analisis Usahatani Buah Naga (Hylocerius sp). (Studi kasus di Kelurahan Sinar Baru, Kabupaten Bangka).Jurnal PASTI XII(3):260.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-28