ANALISIS MANFAAT PPO SANTIAGO (PERKUMPULAN PETANI ORGANIK) BAGI PETANI BERAS MERAH ORGANIK DI KENAGARIAN SARIK ALAHAN TIGO KECAMATAN HILIRAN GUMANTI KABUPATEN SOLOK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36665/jibs.v5i2.358Keywords:
Farmers, Association, Partnership, Organic RiceAbstract
The analysis of the benefits of partnerships refers to the concept of developing business partnerships from the Ministry of Agriculture (2002). An analysis of the benefits of the partnership is carried out to find out how far the effectiveness of the partnership is based on an analysis of the partnership management process itself. The benefits of the partnership itself consist of: 1) Economic Benefits: Revenue, Productivity, Price, Marketing, 2) Technical Benefits: Quality, Mastery of technology. This research is entitled Analysis of the Benefits of PPO Santiago (Organic Farmers Association) for Organic Red Rice Farmers in Kenagarian Sarik Alahan Tigo, Hiliran Gumanti Subdistrict, Solok Regency, which aims to determine the benefits of the Santiago PPO collaboration (Organic Farmers Association) for organic brown rice farmers. 1) Know the profile of PPO Santiago, 2) Know the forms of cooperation that PPO Santiago has with organic brown rice farmers. 3) Knowing the benefits of cooperation for farmers. This research was conducted using a case study method and sampling was carried out by means of simple random sampling. The number of samples in this study amounted to 47 samples. Analysis was carried out by: 1) Quantitatively with an unweighted price index, 2) Quantitative descriptive. The results of the study show that: The form of cooperation that is carried out is mutually beneficial between PPO Santiago and farmers. Economic benefits include: 1) Productivity, showing an increase of 59.375%. 2) Price, grain per kilogram Rp. 6,500, rice per kilogram Rp. 12,500, while the non-organic market price, grain per kilogram is Rp.
4,000, and rice per kilogram Rp. 8,000, an increase in grain prices of 62.5%, rice prices an increase of 56.25%. 3 3) Marketing, a. direct line b. Indirect path. Technical benefits include: 1) Product quality, land preparation to post-harvest under the supervision of PPO Santiago, on average farmers follow 100%. 2) Mastery of technology, the average percentage of sample farmers' mastery of technology is 74.9%.
References
Andriana,E. 2006. Beras MerahKayaVitamin dan Mineral. http://ranririn.blogspot.com/2012/02/beras-merah.html. Diakses pada tanggal 4
November 2015.
Anonim. 1997. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 44. Kebijakan Kemitraan.
Astawan,M.2012. Beras Merah TangkalKanker dan Diabetes. http://library.monx007.com/health/beras merah tangkal kanker dan diabetes/1. Diakses pada tanggal 4 November 2015.
Direktorat Pengembangan Usaha Deptan. 2002. Pedoman Kemitraan Usaha Agribisnis. Jakarta: Departemen Pertanian.
Fagi, A. M. 2005. Menyikapi Gagasan dan Pengembangan Pertanian Organik di Indonesia. Seri AKTP No. 1 / 2005. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.
Haeruman, Herman. 2001. Kemitraan dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal: Bunga Rampai. Jakarta: Yayasan Mitra Pembangunan Desa-Kota.
Hafsah, Mohammad Jafar. 1999. Kemitraan Usaha: Konsepsi dan Strategi. Jakarta: Departemen Pertanian.
Hancock dan Algozzine. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian. Terjemahan: E. koeswara. Bandung.
Hidju, H. 2011. Pengujian Mutu Beras Berdasarkan SNI 6128: 2008. Prodi D III Teknologi Hasil Pertanian Jurusan Agroteknologi Fakultas Ilmu Pertanian Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.
International Rice Research Institute. 2007. Organic Rice. Fact Sheets, Rice Knowledge Bank. www. Knowledgebank.irri. org.
Las, I. 2005. Sudah Perlukah Padi Organik? Warta Litbang Pertanian No.3/2005. Badan
Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Jakarta.
Monica, Dina. 2006. Analisis Sosial Ekonomi Sistem Kemitraan Pengelolaan Wana
Curug Nangka KPH Bogor Perum Perhutani Unit III Jawa Barat dan Banten.
Skripsi. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Mardikanto. 2001. Partisipasi Masyarakat, Tahap-Tahap Partisipasi, Yogyakarta: Graha
Ilmu.
PPO Santiago Kecamatan Hiliran Gumanti 2010. Program Kemitraan.
Purnaningsih, Ninuk. 2006. Inovasi Pola Kemitraan Agribisnis Sayuran di Propinsi
Jawa Barat. Disertasi. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Puspitasari, Indah. 2003. Kajian Pelaksanaan Kemitraan Antara PT. Agro Inti Pratama
dengan Petani Ubi Jalar di Desa Sindangbarang, Kecamatan Jalaksana, Kabupaten Kuningan, Propinsi Jawa Barat. Skripsi. Bogor: Institut Pertanian
Bogor.
Puspitawati, Eka. 2004. Analisis Kemitraan Antara PT Pertani (Persero) dengan Petani
Penangkar Benih Padi di Kabupaten Karawang. Tesis. Bogor: Institut Pertanian
Bogor.
Rosenow, Soltysiak, dan Verschuur. 1996. Organic Farming, Sustainable Agriculture
Put Into Practice. Jerman: IFOAM.
Santika, A. dan Rozakurniati. 2010. Teknik Evaluasi Mutu Beras dan Beras Merah
Pada Beberapa Galur Padi Gogo. Buletin Teknik Pertanian vol. 15. No 1. 2010:
-5.
Saptana. 2006. Analisis Kelembagaan Kemitraan Rantai Pasok Komoditas Hortikultura. Bogor: Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, Badan Litbang Pertanian, Departemen Pertanian.
Scott, James. C. 1981. Moral Ekonomi Petani. Jakarta: PT Intermasa.
Soeharjo, A dan Patong. 1973. Sendi-sendi Pokok Usahatani. Jurusan Ilmu-ilmuSosial Ekonomi Pertanian. Fakultas Pertanian. Bogor: Institut PertanianBogor.
Soekartawi. 1985. Ilmu Usahatani dan Penelitian Untuk Pengembangan Petani Kecil. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Sunito, Satyawan. 2007. Petani, Dominasi Negara dan Perkembangan Kapitalisme. Bahan Kuliah Tidak Untuk Diterbitkan
Sutano, Rachman. 2002. Penerapan Pertanian Organik, Pemasyarakatan & Pengembangannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Veronica, Natalia. 2001. Formulasi Pola Kemitraan Agribisnis Pada PT.
